Report Slams Shocking 64% Rise In London’s Rough Sleepers

The number of homeless people sleeping rough in London has rocketed by 64% since 2010, according to a damning new report.

The report by the London Assembly Housing Committee (LAHC), ‘No Going Back‘, (pdf) reveals that around 6,500 people were seen sleeping rough in London during 2013/14 – an increase of 64% since the tory-led coalition government took office in 2010.

read sbout this on the Welfare News Service site: http://welfarenewsservice.com/report-slams-shocking-64-rise-londons-rough-sleepers/

The reality of the governments welfare reform

The lovely wibbly wobbly old lady

Reposted from the Independent

It’s 20 June, 2013. A 38-year-old man, distressed, emaciated, depleted from chemotherapy, dishevelled from sleeping rough, walks out of Islington council offices on Upper Street, north London, and pulls out a syringe. It contains two grams of crystal methamphetamine – enough to kill him. He finds a vein and slides the needle in. Moments later, pool attendants from the nearby leisure centre see the man collapse on the street. They rush out, and, in the half-breath between life and nothing, reach him, resuscitate him, and phone for help.

“I remember being in tears – there’s only so many times you can hear people say, ‘We can’t help you, we can’t help you, we can’t help you’. I remember hearing voices, too, as if they were really close but they were not, and then hitting a lamppost. The next thing I knew I woke up in the…

View original post 2,619 more words

How people with learning difficulties are expected to live

This is by Kate Belgrave, at katebelgrave.com

 

Yesterday, I went to the home of a Kilburn man who is 51, has mild learning difficulties and currently signs on. He has worked all his life in hotels and in kitchenwork, but found it harder to get and keep work during the recession. He’s been out of work for four years now and is depressed about it. He doesn’t read or write very well and thinks that is the reason he’s finding it difficult to get another job. More on that soon.

For now, he wanted to show me his flat. It’s the tiny, single room in Kilburn you see here – so small that it was difficult for the four of us who were there to fit into all at once. His rent is paid in housing benefit – which means that his landlord gets housing benefit for renting this tiny little room out as a flat.

There was a bed, a broken fridge, another fridge in the middle of the room that this man had bought to keep his diabetes medication in, because it must be kept cool, and a broken oven. He’d got a second smaller oven with two hotplates to sit on top of the broken oven so that he’d at least have hotplates that worked. You can see that in the video. This man has complained to his landlord about the mice and cockroaches that live under the broken oven, but nothing has been done.

There are no windows in this “flat” – just a door that leads to a shared path down the side of the house. In the heat, the room has been nearly uninhabitable. To cap things off, he says he has to do a jobsearch of about seven to ten jobs a week and has been threatened with sanctions if he doesn’t. He has been sent on the work programme. He wants another job. I’ll add to this story and have a lot more video to post, but – have this to think on for now. Here we are in 2014. Austerity’s over, you know. For some.

 

http://www.katebelgrave.com/2014/07/how-people-with-learning-difficulties-are-expected-to-live-jsa-sanctions/

Cameron’s crackdown on immigrant benefits is just another grubby con

Mike Sivier's blog

[Picture: I Am Incorrigible blog - http://imincorrigible.wordpress.com/2013/09/15/evidence-not-ideology-benefit-tourism-the-problem-only-fruitloops-and-tories-can-see/ - which agrees that benefit tourism is a non issue and distraction from the UK's real problems.] [Picture: I Am Incorrigible blog – http://imincorrigible.wordpress.com/2013/09/15/evidence-not-ideology-benefit-tourism-the-problem-only-fruitloops-and-tories-can-see/ – which agrees that benefit tourism is a non issue and distraction from the UK’s real problems.] The UK is to cut the amount of time EU migrants without realistic job prospects can claim benefits from six to three months, according to David Cameron – who seems desperate to take attention away from Andy Burnham’s speech today on the Coalition’s unwanted privatisation of the National Health Service.

According to the BBC, Cameron said the “magnetic pull” of UK benefits needed addressing to attract people for the right reasons.

But the announcement seems to be deliberately confusing.

It seems this restriction will only apply to people born abroad who have had a job in this country and then lost it. They are the only migrant group currently allowed to claim JSA for six months before the benefit is cut off “unless they…

View original post 416 more words

I was ill with hunger, went to prison for stealing food and became homeless

(This was published today on the Guardian’s Society pages)

Welfare expert Matthew Oakley should have spoken to me. I could have told him all about benefits sanctions

In collecting evidence for his review of the failings of the benefits sanctions process, welfare expert Matthew Oakley could have spoken to me. Since 2011, I’ve been sanctioned many times. I received a long benefits sanction due to a mix-up about Work Programme courses I should have attended as a condition of receiving out-of-work benefits. Life became hell. Once my food had run out, I had no money to buy more. I was sent back on the Work Programme but without funds to feed myself. The hunger was unbearable. I did not have the energy to turn up. This led to another sanction.

The sanctions became a vicious cycle as I became too ill to do anything. When I did get a job interview, I looked like a zombie as I had lost so much weight. I could not focus properly and lacked energy. Support from friends and family fell away as they assumed I was addicted to drugs. I was just hungry. I tried contacting my local MP but he did not seem interested. I felt alone and trapped. With nobody to turn to, and feeling like it was my only option, I pocketed a sandwich from a supermarket. I was arrested and fined £80. I had no way of paying and spent a week in prison for non payment. I lost my flat as I was £1,000 in rent arrears and I had piles of outstanding bills.

After a year without benefits, I approached a local homeless shelter for help. They took me in and fed me until the sanction was over. It was only in the hostel that I discovered that I was entitled to hardship payments, of which the Jobcentre had failed to inform me. I now volunteer at the homeless shelter as a thank you for all their help and because it feels good to help feed hungry people. I’ve tried my hardest to avoid more sanctions, but I’ve since been sanctioned for missing my signing in appointment, because I was at a job interview, of all things.

And I’m not alone. A research programme I’m involved in at Leeds University has heard from other people, such as Chloe, who was sanctioned for not doing enough to find work. “Four to eight weeks with no money is pretty alarming when you’ve got kids and bills and a house to run. I think I’ve cried solid for two weeks. I can’t cope,” she told researchers.

As Rosie, another single mother from the study put it: “They’re all right saying that you’re sanctioned as a punishment for not going in [for an appointment] but what am I and my son meant to eat? If that’s the only money we’re getting, what are we meant to do?” I thought “sanctions” were for criminal countries who pose a threat to the world. But now I know they are used against ordinary citizens too.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/29/benefits-sanctions-matthew-oakley-report-hunger

 

A soldier’s tale

The government doesn’t trust the cumulative impact study an independent charity has carried out on it’s welfare ‘reforms’.  Here is the cumulative impact that the Conservative’s welfare reforms are having on one mentally ill army veteran diagnosed with cancer.

An army veteran I know who was homeless didn’t have a bank account or post office account or proof of identity. He suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder dating back to the Iraq war, and has been unable to work for years. They said he had to start using a Payment Card to get his benefits rather than collecting them in cash. But none of the official Paypoints would accept the card without proof of identity. He had to apply for a passport and to do that he needed his birth certificate, and both cost money.

Meanwhile he wasn’t receiving a penny in benefits, and it was a cold winter (2012 – 13), he was developing cancer, since diagnosed,  and didn’t even have the money to pay for an overnight bed in a hostel. He was on the streets, in pain and begging, and borrowing money where he could.

So firstly he had to raise over £100 to apply for birth certificate and passport.  The money was eventually found, an application sent off for the birth certificate. It arrived a couple of weeks later. Off went the application for his passport. It took 5 weeks (no money to pay for a fast track service).

He went to the paypoint with his Benefits Payment card and new passport. Instead of many weeks accumulated back pay, there was no money in the account. Several phone calls later (with no money, remember) he found that as the money had been sitting in the account for over 6 weeks, the DWP had clawed it back. Months and months later, still no backpayment, and he has been unable to pay back the people who lent him money.

At this point he was diagnosed with aggressive colon cancer, which has since spread.

He is now housed in a pokey private let ‘studio’ although he can’t afford heating because of a rampant pre-pay meter, plus having to pay a proportion of his council tax and rent. He is now receiving treatment for his cancer, but still being put through the mill by Atos and co, who have turned down his ESA claim and are forcing him through the appeals process for both his sickness benefit and his Army pension. He has been summoned to four Atos assessments in under a year. He has been offered a place in an Army hospice which he really likes and needs,  but it is over 100 miles away from his flat and hospital treatment.

If he moves to the hospice and transfers his treatment to a local hospital near there, he will lose his flat. And as he will only get out of the hospice if he is better, he will no longer be considered an urgent case by the local council, and will stand no chance of social housing. Or any housing at all in this part of London, because of the benefit cap. He will be back on the streets. Relying on local contacts to survive his precarious life, if he moved out of the area he would be lost.

An army charity has finally provided some funds to take him back and forth from the hospice to his treatment, which involves staying in London a couple of days each week. The London hospital would not provide patient transport from his flat to the hospital because he could walk and did not currently have a terminal diagnosos. He has had to shuffle 4 miles each way to and from the hospital to get his chemotherapy and other treatment. The bowel cancer makes walking very painful, and after chemotherapy a patient is supposed to rest. The bowel cancer has now spread to his bladder.

I have tried to help him over the last year and a half, and he has given me permission to tell his story.

Argotina

Welfare reforms, food banks, malnutrition and the return of Victorian diseases are not coincidental, Mr Cameron

Politics and Insights

1390648_548165358586330_1740107407_n
The coalition will leave more debt than all Labour governments since 1900. The current government is now responsible for £517 billion of the trillion-plus-pound UK public debt, compared to £472 billion accrued during the 33 years Labour led the country since the turn of the twentieth century.

And the figures look even worse when you adjust for inflation. When you do that, the Coalition’s share jumps to nearly half of the total debt.

But the Coalition don’t meet any public’s needs, they simply serve the wants of  a powerful, wealthy elite. Labour invested in public services, the Tories have bled them dry. So, what have they done with the money? Because the public have seen only austerity cuts. And the most vulnerable bear the brunt of the cuts.

Oxfam’s director of campaigns and policy, Ben Phillips, said: “Britain is becoming a deeply divided nation, with a wealthy elite who…

View original post 1,659 more words

Public health statistics could cease to be published amid wave of budget cuts

ONS statisticians also looking at ‘a significant reduction in the scale’ of David Cameron’s ‘wellbeing programme’

A complete halt to the publication of politically sensitive official statistics on smoking, drinking, teenage pregnancies and infant mortality, is being considered for a programme of cuts being drawn up by the Office of National Statistics, documents show.

The statisicians are also looking at “a significant reduction in the scale” of David Cameron‘s pet “well-being programme” including its analysis of inequalities in Britain and making “significant savings” in the orchestration of the official crime survey from next year onwards.

Details of potential cuts to 23 separate sets of official statistics are outlined in a “restricted” annex to a letter from Glen Watson, the ONS’s director-general, sent to other government departments during the recent Treasury spending round, which have been seen by the Guardian.

A spokesman for the ONS confirmed a public consultation on a programme of cuts is to begin within the next month. “Challenging and difficult decisions will need to be made,” said a spokesman. Details of the body’s Treasury funding for the next three years were only finalised this week.

The letter has sparked alarm amongst health campaigners and the research community who point to the fact that several of the statistical series under threat of the axe, such as teenage conceptions, involve issues where Britain fares poorly in the international comparisons. Watson says in the letter, dated 5 April, that the ONS is facing “severe funding pressures” but their ability to find savings is restricted because over 80% of their work is required under EU law.

“The scale of reductions in 2013/14, 2014/15 and those likely in 2015/16 mean that significant reductions in statistical outputs would be necessary unless we can secure additional funding from HM Treasury, or directly from other departments. My priority will be to make sure that we can continue to meet the legal requirements placed on ONS, and to ensure that the statistics we do produce are of sufficiently high quality,” says Watson.

Read the rest of this article here: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/jul/10/public-health-statistics-publish-cuts-cameron?CMP=twt_gu

 

Disabled People In Britain Face ‘Hidden Housing Crisis’ Finds Charity

Same Difference

Disabled people are experiencing a hidden housing crisis, says a new report suggesting that many are having to wash in their kitchens and sleep in their living rooms because their homes are ill-designed for their needs.

The charity Leonard Cheshire Disability claims that as many as five million people now need a disabled-friendly home, a number set to rise as the population ages. A survey for the charity’s Home Truths campaign finds that almost three-quarters of people with mobility problems do not have an accessible door into their building. More than half say their buildings do not have doors and hallways wide enough for a wheelchair.

The report cites the example of Sue Frier, 52, a wheelchair user. Unable to get upstairs, she has been confined to the ground floor of her house, sleeping in her lounge and washing at her kitchen sink. Once a week she pays £30 to…

View original post 273 more words

Criticising Government Policy Online Is “Unacceptable Intimidation” According To Treasury

the void

byteback-fb1As pointed out by @refuted, the Treasury’s claim that a recent anti-workfare social media storm was “unacceptable intimidation” comes just days after an Upper Tribunal judge endorsed this kind of criticism as “legitimate political expression”.

The comments came after news broke that Bristol IT company Byteback had pulled out of workfare a week after being visited by George Osborne to sing the praises of the scheme.  Hundreds of people had contacted Byteback on social media expressing dismay at their involvement in forced work after some fierce questioning from @andygale on twitter caused them to refer to their unpaid workers as ’employees of the state’.

Shortly after this bombardment, and in a huge embarrassment for Osborne, Byteback apologised for their involvement in his grubby scheme and promised “no more involvement ever with workfare”.

This prompted a tantrum from the Treasury who took to the national press to complain of…

View original post 508 more words