The displaced tenants paying the true cost of an inhumane housing policy

Councils must commit to a more humane, thoughtful and cost-effective social housing policy than moving people away from jobs and homes

Moving halfway across the country when you are already vulnerable causes huge emotional and health problems.

read more here:


Rogue Landlords and the Benefit Cap.

Nine billion pounds of taxpayers’ money goes to private landlords every year in housing benefit.

And the Institute for Public Policy Research estimates that at least £3bn of that money is spent on poor quality accommodation annually.

BBC Panorama showed a programme last night called ‘The Great Housing Benefit Scandal’ ( This is not news to me.
Whilst delivering leaflets in this area of London terraced housing,  I find that many are subdivided into 4 or more flats. One has 11 letterboxes. These houses are built as 3 bed residences with a box room. The area is green and leafy and I had no idea before leafleting that this area was so overcrowded, I’ve been living here for decades.

I have visited houses nearby in London where the building has been subdivided into tiny boxes.  Tenants in these tiny boxes tell me they are paying £1,200 per month each which is our tax money spent in the form of housing benefit. This also leaves no money for them to live on, because of the benefit cap. All their permitted benefits go straight to the landlord.

Because of the selling off of council houses, there is nowhere else to put vulnerable people in this part of London. These places are filled with young single mothers, families and the disabled. Nobody else stands a chance of being housed at all locally. This is all due to greedy landlords, the selling off of council homes, and the benefit cap. Two out of three of these causes are policies brought in by the Conservatives.
Here’s an article by the excellent Kate Belgrave published in March…/the-real-scroungers…/
The house next door to mine, once a family home, is now 4 flats containing 11 people, with no fire exit from the top floor. The tenants are frightened of a potential fire, they have small children and live in the converted attic. But they cannot tell the council because they’ll just be evicted, and its nigh on impossible to find an affordable flat in London, no matter how cramped and unsafe. This is a working family, not on benefits.
And its not as if the government doesn’t know. Here’s a Panorama program saying the same thing from 2010:…/fron…/newsid_9122000/9122529.stm This was before the benefit cap.
The benefit cap means that NOBODY on benefits can afford a private rented flat in Inner London, or most of outer London. There are no council flats, they are being destroyed in their thousands and replaced by ‘luxury apartments’. The local authorities are being forced to satisfy their statutory obligations to house the vulnerable by placing them into slum rat holes, or move them hundreds of miles away from their support networks to where rents are cheaper. This is pushing up rents outside of London, too.
The Residential Landlords Association agrees there’s a problem, but says we don’t need more legislation. They say the existing legislation is perfectly adequate, the problem is that savage cuts to Local Authorities budgets means they cant enforce the laws that already exist. Last week the Institute for Fiscal Studies showed that over the course of this Parliament, the budgets of local authority enforcement departments have been cut by over 37% per head of population in England.…/

My local community self help group, Kilburn Unemployed Workers, has had to set up a sister group just for housing, because of the terrible situations people are telling us about every week. The local council is useless. The local Citizens Advice Bureaux  have been closed down. The charities are starved of funds and most cant take on cases, only ‘give advice’.

The foodbanks are thriving.


Christmas cancelled for Gloucester disabled family after dad falls through benefit net

‘CHRISTMAS is cancelled’ for a disabled man who was left penniless after slipping through a benefits net.

The 57-year-old man from Gloucester was deemed fit to work – but was then refused jobseekers allowance because he is disabled. For six weeks he was left with no income.

“Christmas in our house is cancelled,” said the man, who lives with his wife and disabled daughter in Tredworth.

For the past 12 years he has received incapacity benefit, as he suffers from a degenerative spinal condition. He cannot sit in an ordinary chair, is in constant pain and has limited mobility.

Government benefit changes meant he was assessed for the new Employment and Support Allowance in October. But on October 29 his £124 a week payments were stopped because he was assessed as ‘fit to work’ and told to claim Jobseekers Allowance.

“But when I went to the Jobcentre, the man there looked at me and said ‘I can see you’re clearly not fit to work’ and wouldn’t allow me to claim,” he said. “What was I supposed to do?”

He’s been forced to rely on friends and family for seven weeks, visit Gloucester’s Food Bank, and he said: “Christmas is cancelled. It’s very stressful. It’s a terrible thing to be left with no money.”

Gloucester Law Centre came to the family’s aid, and have helped his wife to claim increased Carer’s Allowance, because the couple look after their disabled daughter. But other people in the same position may not have that option. The man still has no income of his own.

“I have disappeared from the statistics,” he said.

Barbara Moran at Gloucester Law Centre, said changes in October mean appeals will take longer. “This is an example of what we feared. To go without money for six or seven weeks causes serious hardship,” she said.

They fear that his case is just the first of a large number of people left with no income.

A spokesperson for the Department of Work and Pensions said: “It is important that we don’t simply write people off. There is strong evidence that working can be beneficial for many people who have a health condition.

“But we also want to ensure those who need it get the right support, which is why a decision on whether someone is well enough to work is taken after consideration of all the supporting medical evidence provided by the claimant. Anyone can appeal against a decision, before the appeal is heard we review all decisions, taking into account further information provided.”