DWP’s Claimant Death Cover-Up

AFTER a long wait, the much anticipated benefit claimant death figures were finally released by Iain Duncan Smith (IDS) this summer after being blocked for months. So, what have we learnt and why haven’t the figures made more of an impact in the media?

Welfare rights specialist Nick Dilworth thinks it’s because “the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) attempted to blind those who’d requested information with science. You’d need a degree in mathematics to properly understand the explanation surrounding the age-standardised mortality rates” (ASMR).

Dilworth paints a picture of the confusion, describing how “the statistical big guns were within hours reaching for their calculators, each coming to a different figure — 2,380 dead, 2,500 dead, 4,000 dead?

“Subsequently the media were misled over the right figures with the DWP issuing a wholly inadequate explanation. Most settled on 2,600 dead, which is a great disappointment to the real victims. They would be entitled to assume the number could be far higher given the scope for many simply not appearing because the DWP failed to provide a comprehensive and all-inclusive explanation.”

It’s important to remember those who’ve had a family member die and who wanted to hear the wider picture. Yet as Dilworth says, “bloggers were also reaching different findings, some making out there was no story while others implied it was a national outrage. Obfuscating the proof was what IDS wanted to achieve, with distraction being a key part of his strategy.”

Dilworth, unlike many commentators, refused to be drawn into this game, instead taking a step back to consider in depth what the figures revealed. He came to six key conclusions:

– The DWP data only related to claimants whose incapacity benefit or employment and support allowance ended because they died. A total of 81,140 people on either benefit died between December 2011 and February 2014.

– The data lacked clarity over whether the correct total for those who died with a “fit for work” finding on their claim was 2,650 or 4,010. As a result, mainstream media issued press articles and headlines which deflected the serious issue raised regarding the fact people had died while deemed “fit for work.”

– Readers of the statistics were thrown a red herring by the DWP’s poorly worded explanation. As a result it was wrongly reported that people had died within two and six weeks of being found “fit for work.” The reference to between two and six weeks related only to aligning the date of death with the closure of the deceased person’s claim.

– Figures of between 2,650 and 4,010 only relate to people who had appealed. In 1,360 “completed appeal cases” this can only mean people who had successfully contested a “fit for work” finding, and then subsequently died thereafter. In the case of those who’d not had their appeal heard, the inevitable conclusion can only be they were still within the appeal system at the time of their death.

– The figures omitted those who’d been found “fit for work” and then either came off benefits or were claiming an entirely different benefit. This left a considerable question mark over the usefulness of the statistics for those who were owed real answers. These were not provided by the generalised issue or age-standardised mortality figures — which excluded large numbers of claimants who made more than one claim for the same benefit (repeat claims were specifically excluded).

– It can reasonably be assumed that a large number of those found fit for work would have gone on to claim jobseekers allowance (JSA). What is known from separate Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures is that between December 2011 and February 2014, 7,645,130 people came off JSA — of which only 3,241,885 found work. An incredible 2,402,755 are recorded as “failed to sign on.” It leaves considerable scope for anyone dying not to be included in the figures at all because the jobcentre won’t have any reason as to why their claim ended.

Read more here: http://morningstaronline.co.uk/a-a0bd-DWPs-claimant-death-cover-up
– Nick Dilworth is a welfare rights specialist, consultant and co-founder with New Approach (www.newapproachuk.org). – –

– Ruth F Hunt is author of The Single Feather (Pilrig Press).

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “DWP’s Claimant Death Cover-Up

  1. I no how people feel I had a drop attack rutered ear and very bag tinnitus in both ears which is getting worst I had 2 brain MRI still need another one am so tired cart sleep dizzy sick and I was found fit for work but doctor says am not fit just yet for work am appealing ESA but have had to sign on they want me to work 30hours a week for my benefit I never went so think tomorrow I will be sancined I also have 3kids as well don’t know how more I can take when am feeling better I intend to get a job I don’t no what to do right now anyone else in the same situation am 40 yrs old replys welcome thanks

  2. This Story makes me sad and very angry. i am UK Veteran and served combat in the Falklands Conflict, I became very ill in 2007 due to massive Heart Attack and then emergency surgery to save my life but this chronic heart failure and am on the watch and wait heart transplant list plus i have other complex health issues that need surgery to fix but because i am not fit for anesthetic can not be sorted.
    My health took a turn for worse recently and started needing more care because i was on DLA i notified the DWP of my health decline and this turned out to be worst thing i could have done. They started me on the PIP process and i had my assessment and they made a decision and they actually reduced the level of help and support by awarding me less money than i was on before.
    The reason was i went through one of their assessments done by a Nurse who failed to record information that would have been to my benefit and put information in the report that did not actually happen. i was reported to have walked 20 metres from one room to another which is in fact less than 5 metres and also walking into the building to reception was also put down as 20 metres which is in fact about 10 feet they went on to tick the box stating i can walk 20 metres to 50 metres thus taking away my mobility component for a car that i use to visit 5 hospitals for vital treatment and health monitoring.
    The DWP will not listen to reason they have ignored all my medical evidence submitted and done there award based on this flawed examination.
    The whole process brought on a very serious Angina Attack that put me into hospital and has cause further damage to my heart.
    I cannot understand why they getting away with causing all this misery to the genuine disabled.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s