Osborne ‘forgets’ to assess impact of benefits cap on disabled people

The government faces new questions about its commitment to supporting disabled people, after the chancellor announced details of a new cap on benefits spending, and then failed to assess its likely impact on disabled people.

Although some campaigners dismissed the cap – which will be introduced from 2015 – as a “gimmick”, the move has been seen as another assault on disabled people’s income.

These concerns are likely to be heightened by the Treasury’s failure to take any account of this and other reforms to social security in an equality impact analysis published alongside this week’s Spending Round 2013 report.

In the disability section of the equality analysis, it mentions increases in spending on mental health treatment, the government’s special educational needs reforms, money spent on improving access to the railway system, NHS spending, disability employment programmes, and even funding for Paralympians.

But there is no mention of the welfare cap, other social security measures announced in the spending round – presented to MPs this week by the Conservative chancellor, George Osborne – or cuts of 10 per cent to local government spending.

The spending round sets out how the government plans to allocate £740 billion of public expenditure in 2015-16, and how it will split £11.5 billion in cuts between government departments.

Osborne made it clear to MPs that the new cap on welfare spending would include expenditure on disability benefits, such as disability living allowance and the new personal independence payment, as well as housing benefit.

The Treasury has yet to clarify with Disability News Service (DNS) whether the cap would also include spending on employment and support allowance (ESA) – the new out-of-work disability benefit – although Osborne said it would exclude benefits that “directly rise and fall with the unemployment rate”, which is likely to include jobseeker’s allowance (JSA).

It is unclear exactly how the cap will work, but Osborne said the Office for Budget Responsibility would be told to issue a “public warning” if social security spending approached the limit set by the government.

If such a warning was issued, the government would “be forced to take action to cut welfare costs or publicly breach the cap”, which will be set for the first time at next year’s budget.

Osborne also announced that all those who lose their jobs will now have to wait for a week – rather than the current three days – before claiming out-of-work benefits. This will not apply to those claiming the contributory form of JSA and ESA, although the Treasury has yet to confirm if it will apply to income-related ESA.

And despite repeated claims by coalition figures such as Esther McVey, the minister for disabled people, that the government’s DLA reforms are not a cost-cutting measure, the new report stresses that the changes from DLA to PIP will “save £1.2 billion in 2015-16”.

Osborne said the series of extra savings he had announced would see another £4 billion cut from spending on benefits in 2015-16, on top of previous cuts of £18 billion a year.

He also announced that another £2 billion a year by 2015-16 would be transferred from the NHS into services commissioned jointly with local authorities, as part of moves towards a more “joined-up” social care and health system.

Debbie Jolly, a member of the steering group of Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), attacked the coalition’s “imposed savagery”, and said the spending round “sets up more horrors for anyone forced to rely on a diminishing welfare state”.

She said the spending round was certain to increase every aspect of “miseries” such as the “bedroom tax”, reliance on food banks, rising costs, and the increasing use of benefit sanctions.

And she said the further cuts to local authorities’ spending would push councils “beyond breaking point, increasing the already dire position of disabled people” faced by the closure of the Independent Living Fund, more “punitive strategies for claimants, more caps and more cuts to justice services for any effective redress”.

 

From Disability News Service, by John Pring, 28th June 2013. Read more here: http://disabilitynewsservice.com/2013/06/osborne-forgets-to-assess-impact-of-benefits-cap-on-disabled-people/

11 thoughts on “Osborne ‘forgets’ to assess impact of benefits cap on disabled people

    • They have it in for the sick and disable because they do not believe them to be economically viable!! Too sick to pay in to the system, they don’t want to know. Evil beyond words

  1. MP’s are Benefit Scroungers not the disabled !!!
    They want a 15% pay rise
    They claim for food and drink
    They claim for travel expenses
    They claim for second homes
    They claim for decorating
    They claim for gardening
    They claim for furniture
    They claim for office stationary
    They claim for council tax
    They claim for house hold bills
    For their Children..in fact they will claim for anything they can !!

  2. Anyone who watched “Heist” on RT Documentaries last night will understand entirely how and why we have come to the predicament, we now find ourselves suffering.

  3. In 2010 the Tories got their votes through carefully worded lying and spin and, of course, a number of omissions such as their plan for the wholesale dismantling of the NHS.. People fell for it then because even in their worst nightmares they could never have imagined that a British government of any colour would let children go hungry or force seriously ill and profoundly disabled people to work or live on fresh air.
    But now they’ve laid their cards firmly on the table and we know the full extent of their treachery and they must know they’ve lost thousands of potential votes in 2015. They didn’t manage to get anything like a majority last time so how can they ever hope to get one in two years time?
    And now we have Labour saying they won’t reverse the cuts and seeming to agree in principle with a lot of what the government have done. I find this pretty scary. If all three main parties are peddling the same agenda it starts to look more like a dictatorship than a democracy.

  4. Pingback: Osborne ‘forgets’ to assess impact ...

  5. Pingback: The Labour Party address welfare wrongs with human rights and strong equality principles. | kittysjones

  6. Pingback: Some progress for the #WOWPetition campaign #CIADisability #MakeRightsReality | Notes from a gay mentalist

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s